Iran preparing now for Armageddon

Reza Kahlili of WND has written a article on Iran’s preparations for war, specifically a Gog Magog war led by the Al-Mahdi, the Shiites legendary 12 Imam who according to Islamic prophecy will conquer the nations of the infidels.   Reza reports in his article that Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has held several secret meetings with his economic and military advisers in recent days to prepare for the possibility of war with the United States. Khamenei has been heard to say that the coming of the  Shiites’ 12th Imam Mahdi is near and that specific actions need to be taken to protect the Islamic regime for upcoming events. Mahdi, according to Shiite belief, will reappear at the time of Armageddon, a Gog Magog war spoken of in the Prophets.

Soldiers of the Mahdi

He has noted that certain elements within the Revolutionary Guards and Basij have been trained under a task force called “Soldiers of Imam Mahdi” and they will bear the responsibility of security and protecting the regime against uprisings.  The plan by the leader calls for total control of Tehran, the capital where the presence of the Basij and Hezbollah militias would be quite visible so that no one would dare to challenge the regime. Khamenei’s  measures are based either on an understanding that war could be imminent or that the regime has decided to announce it has nuclear capability and is getting ready for a possible reaction from Israel or America.

Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, an influential cleric and a radical Twelver, previously had stated that Khamenei ascends to the sky every year to take direction from Imam Mahdi, and sources close to the cleric have disclosed that Khamenei has been ordered by Imam Mahdi to continue with the nuclear program despite worldwide objection as it will facilitate his coming.

Last March, a Iranian secret documentary, “The Coming Is Upon Us,” was revealed to depict Khamenei as the mythical figure who creates the environment for the reappearance of Mahdi by leading Iran to destroy Israel.

Recently, Israel released a series of photographsthat are intended to convey a stern warning to Iran to tread carefully.  The photos released by the Israeli defense establishment of an Arrow 3 anti-missile defense system test as well as other pictures of Israel’s military vigilance.

While it is biblically debatable whether the Islamic Coalition of Psalm 83 is a separate event from the Gog Magog Wars spoken of in the Prophets, both events show HaShem’s Hand in protecting Israel from the surrounding nations.  It should also be noted that Psalm 83 references events in the time of Devorah (Judges) which depict an ancient battle in the area of Megiddo.  It may very well be that the wars depicted in Psalm 83, Ezekiel 38 and the Armageddon battle from the Christian texts are referring to the same series of events.  Regardless, Israel will emerge from these catastrophes intact and stronger than before.

The Timelessness of the Jewish People

In our current season of Presidential politics, more and more people are focusing on the Iranian threat which is now becoming a political hot topic.  I constantly see in print well meaning people who desire protect lil O Israel from the Big Bad Iranians.   As we have expressed continually in our blog, Israel as a military power is no slouch and perfectly capable to handle the Iranians without American and NATO sticking their manipulative noses into a situation which they neither comprehend or are able to solve.

I would like to remind everyone that the Jewish people have an Advocate that is Omnipresent, Omniscient, and Omnipotent and actually has our best interest at heart which is more than I can say for the US NATO Power Elite who only seek to use Israel to further their Globalist Agenda.  I have listed below several quotes by important leaders and dignitaries, political and scholarly, who can attest to the survivability of the Jewish people against all odds – even the Big Bad Iranians and their allies.

If the statistics are right, the Jews constitute but one percent of the human race. It suggests a nebulous dim puff of smoke lost in the blaze of the Milky Way. Properly the Jew ought hardly to be heard of; but he is heard of, has always been heard of. He is as prominent on the planet as any other people, and his commercial importance is extravagantly out of proportion to the smallness of his bulk. His contributions to the world’s list of great names in literature, science, art, music, finance, medicine, and abstruse learning, are also way out of proportion to the weakness of his numbers. He has made a marvelous fight in this world, in all ages: and has done it with his hands tied behind him.All things are mortal but the Jew; all other forces pass, but he remains. What is the secret of his immortality? (Mark Twain)

Asked to make a list of the men who have most dominated the thinking of the modern world, many educated people would name Freud, Einstein, Marx and Darwin. Of these four, only Darwin was not Jewish. In a world where Jews are only a tiny percentage of the population, what is the secret of the disproportionate importance the Jews have had in the history of Western culture? … The Jews have invented more ideas, have made the world more intelligible, for a longer span and for more people than any other group. They have done this indirectly, always unintentionally and certainly not in concert, but never the less comprehensibly… Jews continue to feel the yoke, the task, the moral mission of being Jews-of preserving themselves as such, and to the surprise, scorn, and at times hatred of the rest of the world, of refusing to become anything else… Jews may call themselves humanists, or atheists, socialists or communists…they may even dislike Jewishness and deny it in scientific terms. But, rarely do they refuse to carry it…They won’t give up being Jewish even when they consciously try to, when they change their names, intermarry, and do everything to deny Jewishness. Yet they remain aware of it, and though repudiating it, they cling to it; they may repress it, but do act it out systematically. Their awareness of their Judaism is shared by others simply because their denial is so ambivalent. Unconscious or not, at least some part of every Jew does not want to give up its Jewishness“  (professor of Social Philosophy Ernest Van den Haag)

Their [the Jews] destiny is too imbued with the “metaphysical” to be explained either by material or positive historical terms… Its survival is a mysterious and wonderful phenomenon demonstrating that the life of this people is governed by special predetermination… The survival of the Jews, their resistance to destruction, their endurance under absolutely peculiar conditions and the fateful role played by them in history; all these point to the particular and mysterious foundations of their destiny…( Professor Nicholai Berdyaev (Russian philosopher 1874-1948)

The preservation of the Jews is really one of the most signal and illustrious acts of Divine Providence…and what but a supernatural power could have preserved them in such a manner as none other nation upon earth hath been preserved. Nor is the providence of God less remarkable in the destruction of their enemies, than in their preservation… We see that the great empires, which in their turn subdued and oppressed the people of God, are all come to ruin…And if such hath been the fatal end of the enemies and oppressors of the Jews, let it serve as a warning to all those, who at any time or upon any occasion are for raising a clamor and persecution against them (Thomas Newton (1704-1782), the Bishop of Bristol)

I will insist that the Hebrews have done more to civilize men than any other nation…They are the most glorious nation to ever inhabit this earth…They have given religion to three quarters of the Globe and have influenced the affairs of Mankind, more and more happily than any other nation, ancient or modern.(John Adams, second president of the United States)

Operation Ajax – Why We are Fighting a War on Terror

America’s relationship with Iran has been extremely hostile over the past several decades. From the perspective of most Americans, the seminal event of US-Iranian relations was the siege of the US embassy in Tehran and the subsequent holding of its staff as hostages back in the 1970s.

Many Americans lack a more global perspective of the history of American interactions with Persia. One of the most critical events in that relationship occurred over 50 years ago during the Eisenhower Administration. While Americans may know little about Operation Ajax, its memory still evokes intense anger from nearly every Iranian.

The 1953 Iranian coup d’état (known in Iran as the 28 Mordad coup) was the intentional overthrow of the democratically elected government of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddeq on 19 August 1953, orchestrated by the intelligence agencies of Great Britain  and the United States under the name TPAJAX Project.The coup saw the transition of Mohammad-Rezā Shāh Pahlavi from a constitutional monarch to an authoritarian one who relied heavily on United States support to hold on to power until his own overthrow in February 1979.

Sandra Mackey’s  book The Iranians addresses the overthrow of Muhammad Mossadeq’s short-lived, democratic government by the Central Intelligence Agency in 1953 and the reinstallation of the Shah to the throne. In 1951,  control of Iran’s oil fields by  British company - The Anglo-Iranian Oil Company, or AIOC, now British Petroleum (BP) became a political topic. The Iranian people believed,  justifiably so, that the arrangement between the Iranian government and AIOC unfairly benefited the company. Muhammad Mossadeq, then a member of the Iranian parliament, took the lead in demanding a renegotiation of the pact. The masses of the Iranian people rallied to his standard and quickly made him the most revered leader in the land. The Shah, who then ruled as an authoritarian monarch, lost control of events as his previously powerless parliament (the Majlis) took on a life of its own.

Mackay notes:

With Mossadeq leading the charge against Iran’s economic master, the Majlis, on March 15, boldly nationalized the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company…On April 29, the same Majlis elected Muhammad Mossadeq prime minister. While the shah sat on the throne as a mere shadow, Muhammad Mossadeq basked in the acclaim of the vast majority of Iranians, who for the first time in decades gave their genuine respect, devotion, and loyalty to their recognized leader.

 For the first time in its long history, Iran had a democratically elected leader.

Mossadeq demanded a share in the oil profits, a 25% share.  The Brits however were not about to allow him to grab any of what they considered their property and contacted the American government to help. Eventually, the decision was made in Washington that Mossadeq had to go. Brigadier General Norman Schwarzkopf (father of the Gulf War commander) and CIA guru Kermit Roosevelt (grandson of Teddy) were ordered to begin a covert operation designed to remove Mossadeq and restore the Shah to absolute authority. A complex plot, codenamed Operation Ajax, was conceived and executed from the US Embassy in Tehran.

Using CIA assets in the Iranian military, various minor political parties, and the Shiite clerics and their followers, an uprising was staged.  The Americans double crossed the Shiite populace and had the Shah return to the throne.  Mackey describes the climax:

For nine hours, the pro-shah army, utilizing American-style military strategy and logistics, battled pro-Mossadeq demonstrators. At least 300 people died. By nightfall, the Mossadeq partisans had drawn into a tight cordon around the premier’s palace. Inside, the aged and always ailing prime minister threw a coat over his pajamas, leaped over the garden wall, and went into hiding. Forty-eight hours later he was arrested. The brief euphoric moment when the followers of Mossadeq believed that he held Iran’s destiny in his hands evaporated.

The Shah, who had fled to Rome, rode back to power on the tip of American bayonets, a move which infuriated the Shiite Muslim populace. In essence, the United States had engaged in a massive covert operation designed to remove a democratically elected leader from power and reinstall an authoritarian monarch (a mockery of our currently stated desire to “spread democracy” in the Middle East).

This affair had several disastrous ramifications for the future of American-Iranian relations. First, the Shah, from that point forward, was viewed as a puppet of America. Consequently, America became complicit to his every oppressive act during the subsequent 26 years of his harsh rule. Second, the American embassy in Tehran was permanently marked as a “nest of spies” in the eyes of the Iranian populace. And third, Iranian democracy was strangled in its crib.

The next time the populace rose to overthrow the Shah (in the 1970s), they viewed America as their enemy and were cheering a leader who was significantly less democratic than Mossadeq. When rumors began circulating that the Americans were going to bring the Shah back via yet another covert operation, the Iranian mobs responded by seizing the US embassy in Tehran and holding its workers hostage.

Today our WAR ON TERROR is a direct result of our intrusion into the affairs of another counties political landscape.  If Mossadeq’s regime had been permitted to continue, it is entirely possible that Iran could have evolved into an authentic democracy, and a friend to the United States.

This horrid abuse of power by the US Government has also worsened the relationship between Israel and it’s neighbors, who view the secular Israeli government as a tool of the US. American interventionism destroyed that opportunity and set the stage for many of the tragedies currently haunting the Middle East. If America is ever to have even remotely cordial relations with Iran, we must accept responsibility for the terrible effects of Operation Ajax and admit that we had no right to intervene in a controversy that was wholly the business of the Iranian people. That exploit was unworthy of the memory of our founding fathers and the numerous war dead that America has suffered to prop up the Empire of Amerika.

See InfoWars YouTube video “Do Americans want to Attack Iran?”

Ron Paul is Right on Iran and the Israeli’s Agree

Most of our political leaders who are running for President in 2012, Democrat and Republican alike, are drumming up support for a military strike on Iran.  These political ‘talking heads’ are suggesting that Iran is an existential threat to Israel and the US and are preparing the public for a war against Iran.   Ron Paul says that Iran is not an existential threat to Israel and can handle the Iranians themselves and both Prime Minister Netanyahu and the head of the Mossad agree.

While it is obvious that Iran is a threat to Middle East peace, it is no match for the Israelis and any declarations of an existential threat seem to be coming mainly from the American Military Industrial Complex to expand their failing empire.

See the YouTube video “Intelligence Officer: Ron Paul is Right”

Wake Up Israel! – America is Falling

America gives Israel over 3 billion dollars in military aid each year, a mere 1.4% of Israel’s GNP.  But the price extracted from Israel for this far exceeds the value recieved.  And while the American people overwhelmingly support Israel and it’s people, the US Government uses Israel to extend it’s failing empire and cares not for Israel or the Middle East for that matter.

The people of Israel must wake up to the reality of America’s coming collapse and throw off the chains that bind her to the American Military & Industrial Complex which is responsible for much of the worlds wars and social ills.  The American State is much like the ancient Empire of Rome.  And if we don’t get control of our government from the Power Elite, America will fall.

Rome much like America started out as a representative government.  After a few centuries it morphed into a dictatorship with Julius Caesar as it’s emperor.  Romans loved the high life and spared no expense on their desires for the finer things in life.  Eventually this caused a trade imbalance.  Rome responded to this by debasing their currency – they put less silver in their money, thereby cheating their citizens and neighbors of their hard earned money.  Once the masses were aware of this fraud, the value of the currency started to sink which eventually triggered massive inflation.  The Roman government then turned to the military and began using them in oppressive wars of choice which made tons of money for the Roman government to continue expanding their empire.  Eventually the Roman government had amassed a crushing debt which led to the collapse of their empire.

See YouTube video on Economic Collapse

America is on a similar track, but one which is taking place much quicker.  Our representative government is gone, transformed into a ‘friendly’ dictatorship.  Our elected representatives no longer listen or care about what We the People want.  Our government declares wars against other nations without the due process of law.  Our president is joke – a haughty man of no repute who despises our Constitution.  We have a 14.3 trillion dollar debt crushing our economy.  We are involved with 5 wars of choice to help prop up our economy.  Currently inflation is being suppressed artificially but will eventually will begin to grow, thereby placing us in the ‘misery index’ with run away inflation plus large scale unemployment.

Israel will eventually have no one to give it foreign military aid.   The American collapse will be devastating to the world’s economy but Israel can and will survive.   1.4% of Israel’s GNP can be made up, but they need to start now.

http://youtu.be/FrxOtWvfv1E

PM Netanyahu’s Speech at the UN General Assembly – January 2012

PM Netanyahu’s Speech at the UN General Assembly

Mr. President, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Nearly 62 years ago, the United Nations recognized the right of the Jews, an ancient people 3,500 years-old, to a state of their own in their ancestral homeland. I stand here today as the Prime Minister of Israel, the Jewish state, and I speak to you on behalf of my country and my people. The United Nations was founded after the carnage of World War II and the horrors of the Holocaust. It was charged with preventing the recurrence of such horrendous events. Nothing has undermined that central mission more than the systematic assault on the truth. Yesterday the President of Iran stood at this very podium, spewing his latest anti-Semitic rants. Just a few days earlier, he again claimed that the Holocaust is a lie.

Last month, I went to a villa in a suburb of Berlin called Wannsee. There, on January 20, 1942 , after a hearty meal, senior Nazi officials met and decided how to exterminate the Jewish people. The detailed minutes of that meeting have been preserved by successive German governments. Here is a copy of those minutes, in which the Nazis issued precise instructions on how to carry out the extermination of the Jews. Is this a lie? A day before I was in Wannsee, I was given in Berlin the original construction plans for the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp. Those plans are signed by Hitler’s deputy, Heinrich Himmler himself. Here is a copy of the plans for Auschwitz-Birkenau, where one million Jews were murdered. Is this too a lie? This June, President Obama visited the Buchenwald concentration camp. Did President Obama pay tribute to a lie?And what of the Auschwitz survivors whose arms still bear the tattooed numbers branded on them by the Nazis? Are those tattoos a lie? One-third of all Jews perished in the conflagration. Nearly every Jewish family was affected, including my own. My wife’s grandparents, her father’s two sisters and three brothers, and all the aunts, uncles and cousins were all murdered by the Nazis. Is that also a lie?

Yesterday, the man who calls the Holocaust a lie spoke from this podium. To those who refused to come here and to those who left this room in protest, I commend you. You stood up for moral clarity and you brought honor to your countries. But to those who gave this Holocaust-denier a hearing, I say on behalf of my people, the Jewish people, and decent people everywhere: Have you no shame? Have you no decency? A mere six decades after the Holocaust, you give legitimacy to a man who denies that the murder of six million Jews took place and pledges to wipe out the Jewish state. What a disgrace! What a mockery of the charter of the United Nations! Perhaps some of you think that this man and his odious regime threaten only the Jews. You’re wrong. History has shown us time and again that what starts with attacks on the Jews eventually ends up engulfing many others.This Iranian regime is fueled by an extreme fundamentalism that burst onto the world scene three decades ago after lying dormant for centuries.

In the past thirty years, this fanaticism has swept the globe with a murderous violence and cold-blooded impartiality in its choice of victims. It has callously slaughtered Moslems and Christians, Jews and Hindus, and many others. Though it is comprised of different offshoots, the adherents of this unforgiving creed seek to return humanity to medieval times. Wherever they can, they impose a backward regimented society where women, minorities, gays or anyone not deemed to be a true believer is brutally subjugated. The struggle against this fanaticism does not pit faith against faith nor civilization against civilization. It pits civilization against barbarism, the 21st century against the 9th century, those who sanctify life against those who glorify death. The primitivism of the 9th century ought to be no match for the progress of the 21st century. The allure of freedom, the power of technology, the reach of communications should surely win the day.

Ultimately, the past cannot triumph over the future. And the future offers all nations magnificent bounties of hope. The pace of progress is growing exponentially.It took us centuries to get from the printing press to the telephone, decades to get from the telephone to the personal computer, and only a few years to get from the personal computer to the internet. What seemed impossible a few years ago is already outdated, and we can scarcely fathom the changes that are yet to come. We will crack the genetic code. We will cure the incurable. We will lengthen our lives. We will find a cheap alternative to fossil fuels and clean up the planet. I am proud that my country Israelis at the forefront of these advances – by leading innovations in science and technology, medicine and biology, agriculture and water, energy and the environment. These innovations the world over offer humanity a sunlit future of unimagined promise.

But if the most primitive fanaticism can acquire the most deadly weapons, the march of history could be reversed for a time. And like the belated victory over the Nazis, the forces of progress and freedom will prevail only after an horrific toll of blood and fortune has been exacted from mankind. That is why the greatest threat facing the world today is the marriage between religious fanaticism and the weapons of mass destruction. The most urgent challenge facing this body is to prevent the tyrants of Tehran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Are the member states of the United Nations up to that challenge?

Will the international community confront a despotism that terrorizes its own people as they bravely stand up for freedom? Will it take action against the dictators who stole an election in broad daylight and gunned down Iranian protesters who died in the streets choking in their own blood? Will the international community thwart the world’s most pernicious sponsors and practitioners of terrorism? Above all, will the international community stop the terrorist regime of Iran from developing atomic weapons, thereby endangering the peace of the entire world? The people of Iran are courageously standing up to this regime. People of goodwill around the world stand with them, as do the thousands who have been protesting outside this hall. Will the United Nations stand by their side?

Ladies and Gentlemen, The jury is still out on the United Nations, and recent signs are not encouraging. Rather than condemning the terrorists and their Iranian patrons, some here have condemned their victims. That is exactly what a recent UN report on Gaza did, falsely equating the terrorists with those they targeted. For eight long years, Hamas fired from Gaza thousands of missiles, mortars and rockets on nearby Israeli cities. Year after year, as these missiles were deliberately hurled at our civilians, not a single UN resolution was passed condemning those criminal attacks. We heard nothing – absolutely nothing – from the UN Human Rights Council, a misnamed institution if there ever was one. In 2005, hoping to advance peace,Israel unilaterally withdrew from every inch of Gaza . It dismantled 21 settlements and uprooted over 8,000 Israelis. We didn’t get peace. Instead we got an Iranian backed terror base fifty miles from Tel Aviv. Life in Israeli towns and cities next to Gaza became a nightmare. You see, the Hamas rocket attacks not only continued, they increased tenfold. Again, the UN was silent.

Finally, after eight years of this unremitting assault, Israel was finally forced to respond. But how should we have responded? Well, there is only one example in history of thousands of rockets being fired on a country’s civilian population. It happened when the Nazis rocketed British cities during World War II. During that war, the allies leveled German cities, causing hundreds of thousands of casualties. Israel chose to respond differently. Faced with an enemy committing a double war crime of firing on civilians while hiding behind civilians -Israel sought to conduct surgical strikes against the rocket launchers. That was no easy task because the terrorists were firing missiles from homes and schools, using mosques as weapons depots and ferreting explosives in ambulances. Israel , by contrast, tried to minimize casualties by urging Palestinian civilians to vacate the targeted areas. We dropped countless flyers over their homes, sent thousands of text messages and called thousands of cell phones asking people to leave. Never has a country gone to such extraordinary lengths to remove the enemy’s civilian population from harm’s way. Yet faced with such a clear case of aggressor and victim, who did the UN Human Rights Council decide to condemn?Israel. A democracy legitimately defending itself against terror is morally hanged, drawn and quartered, and given an unfair trial to boot.

By these twisted standards, the UN Human Rights Council would have dragged Roosevelt and Churchill to the dock as war criminals. What a perversion of truth. What a perversion of justice. Delegates of the United Nations, Will you accept this farce? Because if you do, the United Nations would revert to its darkest days, when the worst violators of human rights sat in judgment against the law-abiding democracies, when Zionism was equated with racism and when an automatic majority could declare that the earth is flat. If this body does not reject this report, it would send a message to terrorists everywhere: Terror pays; if you launch your attacks from densely populated areas, you will win immunity. And in condemning Israel , this body would also deal a mortal blow to peace.Here’s why. When Israel left Gaza , many hoped that the missile attacks would stop. Others believed that at the very least, Israel would have international legitimacy to exercise its right of self-defense. What legitimacy? What self-defense?

The same UN that cheered Israel as it left Gaza and promised to back our right of self-defense now accuses us -my people, my country – of war crimes? And for what? For acting responsibly in self-defense. What a travesty! Israel justly defended itself against terror. This biased and unjust report is a clear-cut test for all governments. Will you stand with Israel or will you stand with the terrorists? We must know the answer to that question now. Now and not later. Because if Israelis again asked to take more risks for peace, we must know today that you will stand with us tomorrow. Only if we have the confidence that we can defend ourselves can we take further risks for peace.Ladies and Gentlemen, All of Israel wants peace.

Any time an Arab leader genuinely wanted peace with us, we made peace. We made peace with Egypt led by Anwar Sadat. We made peace with Jordan led by King Hussein. And if the Palestinians truly want peace, I and my government, and the people of Israel , will make peace. But we want a genuine peace, a defensible peace, a permanent peace. In 1947, this body voted to establish two states for two peoples - a Jewish state and an Arab state. The Jews accepted that resolution. The Arabs rejected it. We ask the Palestinians to finally do what they have refused to do for 62 years: Say yes to a Jewish state. Just as we are asked to recognize a nation-state for the Palestinian people, the Palestinians must be asked to recognize the nation state of the Jewish people.

 The Jewish people are not foreign conquerors in the Land of Israel . This is the land of our forefathers. Inscribed on the walls outside this building is the great Biblical vision of peace: “Nation shall not lift up sword against nation. They shall learn war no more.” These words were spoken by the Jewish prophet Isaiah 2,800 years ago as he walked in my country, in my city, in the hills of Judea and in the streets of Jerusalem . We are not strangers to this land. It is our homeland. As deeply connected as we are to this land, we recognize that the Palestinians also live there and want a home of their own. We want to live side by side with them, two free peoples living in peace, prosperity and dignity.

But we must have security. The Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves except those handful of powers that could endanger Israel . That is why a Palestinian state must be effectively demilitarized. We don’t want another Gaza , another Iranian backed terror base abutting Jerusalem and perched on the hills a few kilometers from Tel Aviv. We want peace. I believe such a peace can be achieved. But only if we roll back the forces of terror, led by Iran , that seek to destroy peace, eliminate Israel and overthrow the world order. The question facing the international community is whether it is prepared to confront those forces or accommodate them.

Over seventy years ago, Winston Churchill lamented what he called the “confirmed unteachability of mankind,” the unfortunate habit of civilized societies to sleep until danger nearly overtakes them. Churchill bemoaned what he called the “want of foresight, the unwillingness to act when action will be simple and effective, the lack of clear thinking, the confusion of counsel until emergency comes, until self-preservation strikes its jarring gong.”

I speak here today in the hope that Churchill’s assessment of the “unteachability of mankind” is for once proven wrong. I speak here today in the hope that we can learn from history — that we can prevent danger in time. In the spirit of the timeless words spoken to Joshua over 3,000 years ago, let us be strong and of good courage. Let us confront this peril, secure our future and, God willing, forge an enduring peace for generations to come.

Rumors of Gog Magog

The world is perhaps standing on the edge of the abyss and is virtually on brink of another major war. One which may kick off in Iran. Though sources may disagree on when the conflict would begin, most are convinced that it will begin.  And will surely draw Russia into the conflict.

In a report on Pravda.ru,  Anton Krivenyuk of the Georgia Times  believes the war may begin when Israel strikes Iran’s nuclear weapons capability. The United States has been drumming up ‘war fever’ here in the USA and the Obama regime’ will support the attack. If it happens, the new large-scale regional war will become inevitable.

Therefore, many countries in the region will support Iran either directly or by implication. In particular, it goes about China. Chinese President Hu Jintao stated that if the USA or any other country attacked Iran, China would take responsive measures immediately. As for Moscow, sources at Russia’s Defense Ministry said that the forces in the region had already been mobilized in case of a possible war.  In a previous post we demonstrated the gematrial connection between China and Iran [See Article Here].

The Southern Caucasus borders on Iran. Russia’s borders are near the country too. Armenia and Azerbaijan  border on Iran as well.  Georgia Times and a scientist of politics of the Tbilisi State University (Georgia) tried to predict what consequences the armed conflict may lead to for separate countries of the region.

Georgian scientist of politics, Solomon Lebanoidze, is pessimistic about the future of the region. As he said in an interview with Georgia Times, the war in Iran is very likely to happen. “It may happen that this war may grow into World War III. No one is going to stay aside. There are many nuances here that will not give any country of the Caucasus an opportunity to remain a serene harbor,” the expert said.

It will not be possible for Russia not to be involved in the conflict and may form a military alliance with China in case of the conflict. The alliance may gradually develop into the anti-Western coalition of forces against Israel and the USA, if they get involved in the war too.

In the Tanakh, China is called - Sin.  It’s gematria is 120 (not using the sofit form of the Nun).  China has a long standing relationship with the Islamic Republic of Iran.  China has been helping them since the 1980′s with their nuclear program under the supposed umbrella of peaceful usage.  Iran’s president, Ahmadinejad  also has a gematria value of 120.   In Gematria Ketana, the zero is dropped making it the value of 12, which is the gematria of GOG.   The word time in the last day prophecy is and also equals 120 (12).

Iran’s threat to use nuclear weapons against Israel makes the likelihood of an Israeli first strike more probable, which may be Ahmadinejad’s apocalyptic end game.  If he can get Israel to strike Iran first before ‘Arab Spring Fever’ can erupt in his country, where an estimated 70% of Iranian citizens despise the regime, then an Islamic holy war will erupt in the region.  However it will remain to be seen if it will be the foretold Gog U’Magog Wars.

Update on Iowa Caucus

There are various reports coming in from district captains and Caucus volunteers in Iowa that there has been voter fraud in yesterday Iowa vote. Though none of the bought and sold Mainstream Media will report on it and Congressman Paul is too much of a gentleman to speak of it, many reports coming out of the Alternate Media are verifying that the Power Elite is running scared and willing to do almost anything to try to stop the momentum that Ron Paul has continued to gain. In fact CNN cut the live feed of a US soldier who spoke of voting for Ron Paul.   Statstisics concerning donations from the US Military to presidential candidates show that soldiers give to Ron Paul more than any other candidate. In fact military donations to Ron Paul exceed donations to all other candidates combined, including the Leper Messiah  Barak Obama.

While the “official” count was that Ron Paul came in third, in reality it was a statistical dead heat between the top three with each candidate receiving an equal number of delegates. In New Hampshire Congressman Paul is a strong 2nd and gaining.

Ron Paul the Thinking Man’s Candidate

Many of you may wonder why I spend so much time promoting Ron Paul for the Presidency of the United States.  After all this blog is supposed to be about the prophesies about Israel.   As I have stated over and over again, I firmly believe a Ron Paul presidency will bring about a paradigm shift in American foreign policy and bring an end of the American Empire (the exact opposite of what the Constitution and our Framers envisioned) and free Israel’s hands to do what is needed for it’s own survival.

Many evangelical Christian and a large majority of the American Jewish population believe that Ron Paul is either a racist, anti-Semite or many other unflattering monikers that are being thrown around.   The sad thing is that they have failed to really understand what drives Ron Paul at his core.  Instead of listening to what he is really saying, many people are simply REACTING to language they have been programmed to react to.  The most efficient means of silencing a person, or putting them on the defensive, is to label them something heinous and force them to defend that label. The labels one could use to achieve this are vast, but there are three particular labels that will almost always stop a person dead in their tracks. Those three labels are “racist”, “anti-Semite” and “homophobe”. And for the most part, the indiscriminate use of these labels are a product of America’s growing level of political correctness.

Obviously that isn’t the case with serious claims of racism, as that has been a point of authentic contention for several decades and the occasions of racism in this country are well documented and many. African Americans have been battling true racism for a very long time and it is an issue that should be taken very seriously. If a person truly has espoused racist beliefs and has made those beliefs public, that person should be taken to task on those beliefs and ousted publicly. Unfortunately, there is a huge contingent of politically ignorant people in the world that take their zeal for what they perceive to be political correctness too far, and that has resulted in the unfair labeling of a great many people as racists. When this happens, the most egregious of all crimes against minorities is perpetrated, and that is the marginalization of true racism.

Ron Paul on Racism

Ron Paul has been coming under attack recently for “racist newsletters” that were written in his name over twenty years ago. I should say, he is coming under attack again. This issue was also raised in the last Presidential election, although not as forcefully at that time because Ron Paul  didn’t stand a real chance of winning the Presidency.  So the matter was dropped.

I have looked at much of the so called proof of Ron Paul’s ‘evils’ and much of it is politically motivated.  Instead of calling him racist or anti-Jewish or anti-Israel simply based on the REACTIVE language that is used against him by his political enemies (including the bought and paid for Media), one should ask themselves why is RP against certain legislation or foreign policies.

The so-called racist Ron Paul newsletters were published for over ten years. If you assume that one newsletter was published per month and consisted of, on average, 4 pages of content, then it is safe to assume roughly 480 pages worth of material per year. You can subsequently assume that over the course of ten years there was roughly 4000 separate articles contained within the complete body of work. So out of 4000 articles, or likely more, the establishment was only able to dig up 5-6 quotes that could even be considered mildly incendiary by any standards and no worse than “politically incorrect” by most. To make matters worse, when you research these quotes in full, you begin to realize that at least half of them have been cut & pasted in a manner that distorts the meaning of the quotes, reducing the number of potentially “racist” quotes to three or four. That’s what the establishment has on Ron Paul. That’s the amount of dirt they can get on Mr. Consistent, four quotes over the course of two decades. The man has said repeatedly that he didn’t write these words, but he has also taken full responsibility for them because it happened under his watch (not like the so-called leaders of today who try to pass the buck – leaders like Barack Obama). He has not denied that, he has owned it. But he won’t own the quotes themselves, because they are not his. I take him at his word. He has earned that in my eyes, and it makes the most logical sense.

On the floor of the House of Representatives on June 4, 2004, Ron Paul said, “The civil rights act of 1964 did not improve race relations or enhance freedom.” Paul said he objected to the Civil Rights Act because of its infringement on private property rights.  He said that while he would favor repealing Jim Crow laws, the United States “would be better off” without government intruding on and policing personal lives.    In his speech to Congress explaining his opposition, he said, “The forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty… The Civil Rights Act of 1964 gave the federal government unprecedented power over hiring, employee relations, and customer service practices of every business in the country.  The result was a massive violation of the rights of private property and contract, which are the bedrock of free society.” 

The underlying core value that steers libertarian Congressman Paul’s thinking and decisions is liberty and freedom.  If liberty or freedom are in anyway diminished by any piece of legislation, it is a sure thing that he will be against it.   Dr. Paul said it best in a 2008 interview with Bill Moyers Journal on PBS:

“Libertarianism is the enemy of all racism, because racism is a collectivist idea that you put people in categories. You say, well blacks belong here, and whites here, and women here and we don’t see people in forms..or gays. You don’t have rights because your gays, or women or minorities, you have rights because you’re an individual. So we see people strictly as individuals. We get these individuals in a natural way. So it’s exactly opposite of all collectivism and it’s absolutely anti-racism because we don’t see it in those terms.”  (See YOUTUBE Video)

Black Man Defends Ron Paul

NAACP Nelson Linder speaks on Ron Paul and racism 

The Media is trying it’s best to show Ron Paul as a racist and edited a interview with him to try to discredit him.   The first video is CNN’s edited version which landed on the airwaves, while the unedited version shows Ron Paul in a very good light.

Edited CNN Interview with Ron Paul

Unedited CNN Interview with Ron Paul

Ron Paul’s Anti-Semitism?

The RJC (Republican Jewish Coalition) announced this month that congressman Ron Paul would not be among the six guests invited to participate in its Republican Presidential Candidates Forum. “He’s just so far outside of the mainstream of the Republican party and this organization,” said Matt Brooks, executive director of the RJC, adding that the group “rejects his misguided and extreme views.”

Paul’s exclusion caused an uproar, with critics alleging that his stand on Israel had earned the RJC’s ire; an absolutist libertarian, Paul opposes foreign aid to all countries, including the Jewish state. “This seems to me more of an attempt to draw boundaries around acceptable policy discourse than any active concern that President Dr. Ron Paul would be actively anti-Israel or anti-Semitic,” wrote Reason editor Matt Welch. Chris McGreal of the Guardian reported that Paul “was barred because of his views on Israel.” Even Seth Lipsky, editor of the New York Sun and a valiant defender of Israel (and friend and mentor of this writer), opined, “The whole idea of an organization of Jewish Republicans worrying about the mainstream strikes me as a bit contradictory.” [Source - the Weekly Standard.com]

Congressman Ron Paul, who is leading the polls in advance of next Tuesday’s Republican caucuses in Iowa, denies allegations that he has promoted anti-Semitism, saying that this would be “a betrayal of my own intellectual heritage….Any kind of racism or anti-Semitism is incompatible with my philosophy,” Paul said in an interview with Haaretz.

When asked for his reaction to his exclusion from the function held by the Republican Jewish Coalition, Ron Paul stated:

“ Well, it was a bit surprising and disappointing. I believe that Israel is one of our most important friends in the world. And the views that I hold have many adherents in Israel today. Two of the tenets of a true Zionist are “self-determination” and “self-reliance.” I do not believe we should be Israel’s master but, rather, her friend. We should not be dictating her policies and announcing her negotiating positions before talks with her neighbors have even begun.”

Ron Paul on September 11

One of Ron Paul’s controversial positions is that American support for Israel was one of the reasons for the 9/11 terrorist attacks.  While this may be a controversial position, it shouldn’t be.  It is quite clear that the Jihadists believe this and have openly said so.  Many people I know both fellow Jew and non-Jew believe that American support for the secular Israeli government has spawned the anti-Zionist terrorist agenda.   I believe that this understanding is strengthened by the Hebrew Scriptures, which shows that in the End of Day’s the nations of the world will turn against Israel.  Since 911 more and more of Israel’s former allies have turned against her, continuing to fulfil the prophesies of the Tanakh.

Ron Paul has openly said that he viewed Israel as “one of our most important friends in the world” and that he supports Israel right to attack Iran in self-defense.   In fact when Israel attacked a nuclear reactor in Iraq in 1981, almost the entire U.S. Congress voted to condemn the act. Ron Paul was one of the few dissenters: he voted against the condemnation and in favor of Israel’s right to self-determination.

Blowback from American Foreign Policy

Definition of Blowback by the CIA:  - the unintended consequences of foreign operations that were deliberately kept secret from the American public

The last area of concern is a perceived idea that Ron Paul is dead wrong on American foreign policy.  This idea is promulgated by the idea that America only acts for the good of other nations.  This idea is absolutely false and shows the level of ‘media brainwashing’ that has occurred in America in the last century.   It is our ‘Empire-Driven’ foreign policy that has created the so called War on Terror.  Ron Paul is right on target when he says that it is our occupation of other countries that incites other nations and people’s against America.  Most our our war dead are results of foreign intervention.   While the American government calls them wars necessary to American national security and uses the bought and paid for Media to sell the American Public on them, the reality is that these wars or ‘police-actions’ are nothing more than Empire building.

The ills that our nation is suffering today through the War on Terror are directly connected to events in Iran in 1953.  The Prime Minister of Iran, Muhammed Mozadek, accused the British of ripping off Iran of it’s national resources and demanded that Iran receive it’s fair share of the profits from British endeavors.  The British reacted by collaborating with the American government of President Eisenhower, who promptly declared the Iranian prime minister a communist and sent the CIA into Iran to destabilize his government.  The result is that the Shah was placed into power who ruled Iran with an oppressive regime’ and became a puppet to the Western powers.  Within two decades, the people revolted and established the Islamic Republic of Iran (the Iranian Revolution of 1979), who became the West’s arch-enemy and responsible for much of the terrorism in the world today.

Please see the video on Ron Paul and Foreign Policy

In Closing

While I cannot say for sure that Ron Paul will be the best President America has ever elected, I believe that he is the only candidate that brings certain ingredients to American Politics that it is sorely lacking – INTEGRITY and MORAL CHARACTER.  America has lost her way.  We cannot afford to elect more of the same types of bought and sold politicians that America has produced in the last 75 years.  America needs real change, not the change promoted by the Buffon-in-Charge Barack Obama, may his name be forever purged from our thoughts.  As a result of political correctness and character assassination by political and activist hitmen, the good name of Ron Paul has been run through the mud.   Hopefully, men and women of integrity can see through the lies and deception and go on to support an idea whose time has come.

Vote For Ron Paul in 2012

World War 3

The Global War Machine

Like the magician’s sleight of hand the world’s attention is trained on Syria and Iran as the region continues to move toward military confrontation, while pieces are being put into place for a truly global conflict, with military buildup taking place in every region and threatening to draw in all of the world’s major powers.

WATCH the video