Bloodd Moons, Gog Magog and Obama the Contemptible One

The Obama Regime is planning to force Israel into a peace plan that creates a Palestinian state.Ultimately, nothing good is going to come out of these negotiations and Israel should immediately walk away from the negotiating table.

Any “peace guarantee” that Israel receives will only be temporary.Palestinian Authority Minister of Religious Affairs Mahmoud Al-Habbash made that abundantly clear during a recent sermon. At the Friday Ramadan services, which were attended by Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and broadcast on Palestinian television, Habbash explained to Muslim worshipers that Palestinian Authority officials “only through the wisdom of the leadership, conscious action, consideration, and walking the right path” are headed toward “achievement, exactly like the Prophet [Mohammad] did in the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah, even though some opposed it.”

Palestinian Media Watch – an Israeli research institution that translates anti-Israel broadcasts in the Palestinian media – explains that the Hudaybiyyah peace treaty of 628 A.D. refers to “a 10-year truce that Mohammad, Islam’s Prophet, made with the Quraish Tribe of Mecca. However, two years into the truce, Mohammad attacked and conquered Mecca.”

The Palestinians don’t plan to establish a real, lasting peace with Israel. In fact, according to one survey two-thirds of all Palestinians believe that the eventual goal of the Palestinians must be “to get back all the land for a Palestinian state.”

There is not going to be any solution to the “Jerusalem issue” any time in the foreseeable future even if a peace treaty t is forced upon Israel. And this is precisely what the Tanakh foretold would happen in the last days. In Zechariah 12:3, we are warned:

“And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.“

And this is exactly what has happened. The nations of the  world are trying to figure out what to do about Jerusalem. the burdensome stone.

And the Obama regime should tread with extreme caution. Zechariah also says that “all that burden themselves with it [Jerusalem] shall be cut in pieces”. When the United States forces Israel to divide her land,  the U.S. also find itself divided and cut in pieces. Hopefully HaShem will begin with the traitorous District of Columbia and it’s chief residents.

And it should be noted  that all of this is will be occurring just as we are entering the blood red moon tetrad of 2014-2015. British Consul-General Sir Vincent Fean stated in 2013 that a permanent agreement between Israel and the PA would be reach by the spring of 2014, considered to be ‘crucial to the inception of a Palestinian state’ and just in time for the blood moons of Pesach (Passover).

Over the 5000 years only 142 tetrads have been recorded or known, quite a rare event. But when they all four fall on Jewish holy days, it is extremely rare – only seven of these have taken place since the first century. During past tetrads on Jewish holy days, significant historical events have taken place before, during, or after the blood moons which have historically signaled times of great distress for the Jewish people.

The first of the seven tetrads occurred on Passover and the Feast of Tabernacles in 162 and 163 A.D., which happened during one of the worst persecutions of Jews and Christians that began in 161 by Marcus Aurelius, emperor of Rome.

The second occurred on Passover and the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur) in 795 and 796.

The third tetrad occurred on Passover and Day of Atonement in 842 and 843 A.D. A lot happened in those years that affected both Christians and Jews. In 842 a synod in the eastern Church reaffirmed the use of icons, which had been banned for the second time in 814. In Europe, Muslims had been attacking Sicily for several years as they attempted to conquer Italy and Europe, and this continued as they attacked and captured Messina in Sicily in 842. In 843 the Treaty of Verdun divided the Holy Roman Empire into three parts. This affected Jews adversely because the French were tolerant of Jews, but when the French no longer had power over most of Europe, then anti-Jewish feelings were allowed to manifest, leading to persecution of the Jews.

The Fourth tetrad of eclipses occurred on Passover and the Day of Atonement in 860 and 861 A.D. In 861 Muhammed al-Mudabbir arrived in Egypt and tripled the jizya (tax) on Christians and Jews.

The fifth tetrad occurred on Passover and the Feast of Trumpets in 1493 and 1494. In 1492 King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain ordered the expulsion of all Jews from Spain, about 200,000. Many fled to Morocco where they were later persecuted. It was also in 1492 that Columbus discovered America; the U.S.A. was to become the home of many Jews and a friend to Israel.

The sixth tetrad occurred on Passover and Tabernacles in 1949 and 1950, just after the creation of the Jewish state of Israel in 1948 and the 1st Arab coalition against the newly formed Jewish state culminated in the  Israeli War for Independence which formally ended on July 20th, 1949.

The seventh tetrad  occurred on Passover and Tabernacles in 1967 and 1968, with the 6-Day War taking place in June of 1967 when Israel captured all of Jerusalem and additional land.

The eighth tetrad will occur on Passover and Tabernacles (Sukkot) in 2014 and 2015. So does the blood red moon tetrad of 2014 and 2015 signal that another season of war is now upon us? I believe if we follow the pattern, it bodes for a decisive war – quite possibly the war outlined in Ezekiel, Gog U Magog.

In addition to the blood moons of 2014-2015 is the real possibility of a enormous financial collapse. In 2001 and 2008 we had  stock markets crashes on the ‘shemitah’ – a time that occurs every seven years in ancient Israel when debts were wiped out. The next Sabbatical year is Sept. 25, 2014 thru Sept. 13, 2015. So 9/13/15 is the day to watch. Since we had two stock market crashes outside of a biblical tetrad, something worse, like a dollar collapse could be coming close behind.

Daniel’s prophecy demonstrates that the End of Days despot will force Israel into a peace treaty that gives land to it’s enemies:

In his place a despicable person will arise, on whom the honor of kingship has not been conferred, but he will come in a time of tranquility and seize the kingdom by intrigue. 22 The overflowing forces will be flooded away before him and shattered, and also the prince of the covenant. 23 After an alliance is made with him he will practice deception, and he will go up and gain power with a small force of people. 24 In a time of tranquility he will enter the richest parts of the realm, and he will accomplish what his fathers never did, nor his ancestors; he will distribute plunder, booty and possessions among them, and he will devise his schemes against strongholds, but only for a time.

Israel in Prophecy had written considerable material on this despicable person. We have for a number of years proclaimed that this person is Obama, the president of the US.  We believe he is poised to fulfill biblical prophecy and unilaterally declare a Palestine State which will trigger the biblical juggernaut of the End of Days. We will be watching closely as events unfold.

– 167 Forever

 

 

 

//

Paving the Way for Daniels Prophecy?

In light of recent events, one must ask yourself if we are heading into the fullfilment of Daniels prophecies?

In an Israel Today article, titled :Kerry’s Peace Plan: Divide Jerusalem, Recognize Jewish State,  a New York Times columnist, named Thomas Friedman, who has close ties to the Obama Administration, said that the American Secretary of State John Kerry is about to present a firm (forceful?) American proposal for peace between Israel and the Palestinians.

The Obama plan sees Israel withdrawing from Judea and Samaria in stages. Large Jewish settlements would be left intact and under Israeli sovereignty, and Israel would compensate by surrendering some of its territory to the Palestinian Authority. Jerusalem would be divided, and the eastern half recognized as the capital of “Palestine.” Speaking of recognition, Israel would be explicitly acknowledged as the nation state of the Jewish people. There would be no mass return of Palestinian refugees into Israel.

Israel in Prophecy has not been silent regarding the possible identity of Obama as the End of Days Tyrant whom the Jews call Armilus and the Christians call Antichrist, the Man of Sin. We have dedicated various articles to this topic and remain convinced that he is the end of days despot foretold in Daniel. This monster is destined to make a peace treaty with Israel which will catapult us into a world of calamity and despair. This  treaty according to a careful reading of Daniel suggests that the so called Peace Treaty is actually forced upon Israel, which is exactly what is occurring now.

With recent saber rattling by Russia and the back-stabbing deal the US made with Iran, some believe that this could lead to the Biblical prophecy of Gog U Magog of Ezekiel.

And the word of the Lord came unto me, saying, Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog [the Russian Federation]…and prophesy against him, And say, Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I am against thee, O Gog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal: And I will…bring thee forth, and all thine army…. Persia [ancient kingdom of Iran], Ethiopia, and Libya with them.” (Ezekiel 38:1–5)

Although Gog  invasion  goes wrong for Iran, Russia, and their confederates (see Ezekiel 38:21), one cannot read this prophecy  and fail to reflect upon the events of recent days involving Iran and its leaders, Russia and its leaders, and the current push by the president of the United States to force Israel into a false peace with the Palestinians, all the while while secretly negotiating a nuclear agreement with Iran (made public in late 2013).

The Obama regime, with Secretary of State John Kerry in the lead, joined with the international community in making an agreement with the Iranian regime that many view as a betrayal of Israel.

 Israeli PM  Netanyahu saw through these Machiavellian machinations, and harshly condemned the nuclear deal with Iran as a massive failure of [United States] foreign policy. “What was reached last night in Geneva is not a historic agreement, it is a historic mistake,” he said, before including: “Today the world became a much more dangerous place because the most dangerous regime in the world made a significant step in obtaining the most dangerous weapons in the world.”

We should not fail to take into account HaShem’s promise of safety for the Jewish nation mentioned in various places in the Tanakh. We should also know that while the Obama regime is trying to force this treaty on Israel, the Jewish people have powerful memories of those who have promised to exterminate them – Haman in the Book of Hadassah (Ester) the arch villian in ancient Persia, Nazi Germany in the past and  Iran (Persia) today. Survival by any means necessary pervades their hearts at this stage in history.

Because of this resolve, some believe, just as in the days of Haman, Obama’s fait accompli (something that has happened and cannot be undone – just like the Persian law which condemned the Jewish captives) regarding  conspiratorial deals with Israel’s enemies could result literally  overnight in the war  in Ezekiel.

In a speech before  the  68th Session of the United Nations (2013), Prime Minister Netanyahu himself affirmed:

In our time the Biblical prophecies are being realized. As the prophet Amos said, they shall rebuild ruined cities and inhabit them. They shall plant vineyards and drink their wine. They shall till gardens and eat their fruit. And I will plant them upon their soil never to be uprooted again.

The stage is being set, the players are taking there positions. Will the Gog U Magog war ignite in our days? Only Hashem is in control of all the game pieces. Only He knows the outcome of these events.



 

Obama – Enemy of Israel

The following article was sent to us from Ted Belman at Israpundit

 

By Amnon Lord

 

Now that the best and brightest have finished their comparisons with Munich and Chamberlain, I wish to provide another, somewhat more shocking, comparison, one that in the past, resulted in people calling for smelling salts.

 

In March 2010, I attempted to explain the American president’s seemingly incomprehensible behavior in simple terms, making use of the name Charles Lindbergh. The legendary pro-Nazi pilot surfaced again in Philip Roth’s novel “The Plot Against America”, published in 2004. Roth penned a novel based on speculative history (“what would have happened if…”)- in this case, what would have happened had Charles Lindbergh won the 1940 elections rather than FDR, the incumbent against whom he ran for president.

The great United States of America and the great land of Germany – the land that was, coincidentally, ruled at the time by that Chancellor named Adolf Hitler – would have developed ties of friendship and mutual accord. Roth waxed eloquent on the effects this would have had on American Jewry and on the resulting cooperation that would have developed between American Jewish leadership and the new anti-Jewish American government.

 

For nearly four years now, it has been clear that the then-new American president sees the world in a fashion that is diametrically opposed to what we expect from an American government. He disposed of the bust of Churchill that stood in the White House. All the historical narrative that contains the struggle of democracies against totalitarian regimes, the Munich agreement, appeasement, giving in, Chamberlain – all those are one story in his history book. Even the Spanish Civil War is irrelevant. In his book there are imperialism, colonialism, Zionist aggression and peoples that awaken and rebel. That is how, in 2010, this Lindbergh-style president supported Argentina in the renewed hostilities that developed between that country and Great Britain over the Falkland Islands.

 

By the beginning of 2010, when Obama began a political siege on Israel for building in Jerusalem while evincing goodwill gestures such as stretching out a hand towards Ahmadinejad’s Iran, shaking hands with and hugging Chavez as well as offering US friendship to the then president of Brazil, Lula de Silva, it seemed clear that the American president felt that the world was ready for the Chavesian, Ahmadinejadian and Bashar-Assadian style of leadership.

 

Obama simply prefers Iran over Israel.
On his visit to Israel in March 2010, the above-mentioned Lula pointedly refrained from laying a wreath on Herzl’s grave; he most decidedly did not refrain from laying one on Arafat’s grave. This is the world in which the American president feels at home, the one he sees himself leading.

 

The agreement signed with the Iranians in Geneva sets a new record for the about-face in policy that characterizes the US government under Obama.

 

Obama’s policy is not centered on neutralizing Iran’s nuclear power. It is centered on the beginning of a wonderful friendship with the Ayatollahs whose regime has not retreated from plans to destroy Israel and which has not abandoned its worldwide terror network.


The secret communications channel, the details of which were revealed in the Maariv Hebrew newspaper magazine cover story, proves that there is a change in orientation and not a concerted diplomatic effort to prevent nuclearization. In the not-too-distant future, we will see Obama on a historic visit to Tehran and watch him shake the hand of the “Supreme Spiritual Leader”.

 

The fact that Obama has adopted a Lindberghian policy doesn’t mean that in this new context he is not being realistic. The worrisome reality is that the relative strengths in the much-discussed, historical hostility between Sunnis and Shiites in the Middle East, are not balanced, this according to a reliable security source with access to intelligence data. Syria is the main area for this struggle and what the US and Israel see is that the Shiites, backed by Iran, are a solid power with the ability to control and carry out a clear policy.

 

In contrast, the Sunnis do not have any real power at this point. They are fragmented. The Syrian opposition has not proved that it is internally cohesive and can control and keep order in major sections of Syria, let alone in Iraq. They were unable to retain power even in Egypt, where the Muslim Brotherhood won control. So the Americans handed over Iraq, Syria and Lebanon to Iran.

 

There is no doubt that President Obama knows very well that he is turning into a partner of leaders who have committed crimes against humanity and a friend of those who declare their intentions of doing so. No problem. He simply prefers Iran over Israel.

 

In addition, it must be added, that in terms of the past, Israel also preferred the forces known today as Shiite: Iran, the Lebanese Shiites (who became the Hezbollah), for example. But in Obama’s case, strategic realism is simply a cover-up for ideological preference.

 

Obama also prefers to place a wreath on the grave of Ayatollah Khoumeini rather than those of Herzl or Ben Gurion.

 

This May Sound Terrible, but….

 

Amir Oren, the Haaretz writer who acts as if he is an American source of influence, had a slip of the tongue last week when he said:

 

    “..This is the reason for the adamant refusal of 5 presidents over 28 years to forgive Pollard. The man himself is not important to America, the punitive and preventive lesson his story teaches Israel is what counts: don’t be a wise guy and don’t show off…Netanyahu, in this regard, is liable to become a political Pollard.”

 

It is probably accurate to say that Amir Oren is threatening us. But who has sent him? Who is behind him? After all, Oren himself is of no importance. What is important is what he is telling us about the real American use of Pollard. The same point was taken on Israel’s Channel 2 “Facts” show and in another article by Nahum Barnea (famous columnist, ed.) on relations between the US and Israel. Barnea, unlike Oren, is not confused about where his loyalties lie. He is an Israeli and a patriotic one. He does not think that the Americans are wise or justified in torturing one of their own citizens this way. He has a different spin, comparing Pollard with the freeing of the Iranian scientist within the framework of the Iran agreement.

 

The slip of the tongue at the beginning of last week was meant to remind former/retired Israeli security personnel that they had better continue to cooperate with the Americans in their anti-Israeli government policies, given that the basic premise is that what is good for the USA is not good for Israel.

 

I know. It sounds terrible. But the highest ranking security personnel in Israel see what happened to certain persona over the years because of the Pollard and other sagas. Rafi Eitan (who was Pollard’s handler) cannot enter the USA. Aviam Sela’s (the Israeli general who planned the Osirak attack) budding career was destroyed by American dictates. Amos Yaron (Dir.Gen. of the Defense Ministry during the Sabra and Shatila massacre) has problems. Even (former Mossad head) Yuval Diskin once had trouble getting a visa to the USA.

 

And even more telling: there is a great demand – and rightly so – for the skills of Israeli security people in various industries here. They combine vast knowledge with diplomatic ability that ordinary businessmen lack. And developing weapons exports vitalizes the Israeli economy – but some of this trade requires American authorization and is dependent on the US.

 

Therefore, as awful as it sounds, it is quite possible to envisage a situation where top level Israeli security persona fall into line with US directives in an unwritten agreement: i.e. we will back your positions in exchange for freedom of employment. Wikileaks documents exposed the terrible blabbing of Israeli security and intelligence personnel at the American Embassy; one can only imagine what they say when they are actually in the US.

 

So Pollard serves as the stick; and as far as concerns the carrot, I suggest taking a look at how for many years top policy-makers have said that Saudi Arabia – and even Bill Clinton said it – is the pension fund of retired American government officials: Say what we want you to say, announce policies that we like, and at retirement, accept a lucrative job at our expense.

 

I know it sounds just terrible when it is applied to our people.

 

And what about former prime ministers? Let us just say that in the marketplace of lectures at universities and various institutes, Ehud Olmert is not paid to talk about the exciting cultural renaissance in Israel nor about its hi-tech. He is paid to sell Israel and its government down the river for the highest available price.

The Six Day War

 

The Six-Day War

June 5–10, 1967

by Eli E. Hertz | June 6, 2013

 

In rememberance of the Israeli victory against all odds in 1967 against 5 Arab aggressor nations, we are posting the following article from Eli Hertz

Arab Losses Caused by Unlawful Acts of Aggression in 1967

In June 1967, the combined armies of Egypt, Syria, and Jordan attacked Israel with the clear purpose expressed by Egypt’s President: “Destruction of Israel.” At the end of what is now known as the Six-Day War, Israel, against all odds, was victorious and in possession of the territories of the West Bank, Sinai and the Golan Heights.

International law makes a clear distinction between defensive wars and wars of aggression. Egypt’s blockade of the waterway known as the Strait of Tiran, which prevented access to Israel’s southern port of Eilat, was an act of aggression that led to the Six-Day War in 1967. More than six decades after the 1948 War and four decades since the 1967 Six-Day War, it is hard to imagine the dire circumstances Israel faced and the price it paid to fend off its neighbors’ attacks.

In 1967, the combined Arab armies had approximately 465,000 troops, more than 2,880 tanks and 810 aircrafts, preparing to attack Israel at once. Israel, faced with the imminent threat of obliteration, was forced to invoke its right of self-defense, a basic tenet of international law, enshrined in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter. Israel launched a surprised pre-emptive air strike against Egypt on June 5, 1967.

Who Starts Wars Does Matter

UN Charter Article 51 clearly recognizes “the inherent right of individual or collective self-defense if an armed attack occurs against a Member of the United Nations” by anyone.

Arabs would like the world to believe that in 1967, Israel simply woke-up one morning and invaded them, and therefore Israel’s control of the Golan Heights, West Bank and Sinai is the illicit fruit of an illegal act – like Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait in 1991.

Arab leaders ‘bundle’ the countries who fought Israel in the 1967 Six-Day War into one “entity” in order to cloud the issues. They point to Israel’s surprise pre-emptive attack on Egypt as an act of unlawful aggression, and add that this “unlawful aggression” prevents Israel from claiming the Territories under international law.

Professor, Judge Stephen M. Schwebel, past President of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) states the following facts:

“The facts of the June 1967 Six Day War demonstrate that Israel reacted defensively against the threat and use of force against her by her Arab neighbors. This is indicated by the fact that Israel responded to Egypt’s prior closure of the Straits of Tiran, its proclamation of a blockade of the Israeli port of Eilat, and the manifest threat of the UAR’s use of force inherent in its massing of troops in Sinai, coupled with its ejection of United Nations Emergency Force (UNEF). It is indicated by the fact that, upon Israeli responsive action against the UAR, Jordan initiated hostilities against Israel. It is suggested as well by the fact that, despite the most intense efforts by the Arab States and their supporters, led by the Premier of the Soviet Union, to gain condemnation of Israel as an aggressor by the hospitable organs of the United Nations, those efforts were decisively defeated. The conclusion to which these facts lead is that the Israeli conquest of Arab and Arab-held territory was defensive rather than aggressive conquest.”

Egypt in 1967

Before Israel’s pre-emptive and surprise attack on the Egyptian Air Force, a series of belligerent acts by the Arab state justified Israel’s resort to arms in self-defense in accordance with the Law of Nations.

The Egyptians were responsible for:

– The expulsion of UN peacekeepers from Sinai – stationed there since 1956 to act as a buffer when Israel withdrew from Sinai;

– The closure of Israel’s outlet from the Red Sea in defiance of the Geneva Conference of 1958 on free navigation “through straits used for international navigation between one part of the high seas and … the territorial sea of a foreign nation” (For 16 years Egypt illegally blocked Israeli use of the Suez Canal);

– The failure of the international community to break the blockade; and

– The massing of Egyptian forces in Sinai and moving them toward Israel’s border.

In 1956, when Egypt provoked Israel by blockading the Red Sea – crippling her ability to conduct sea trade with Africa and the Far East – the major Western powers negotiated Israel’s withdrawal from the Sinai Peninsula, and agreed that Israel’s rights would be reserved under Article 51 of the UN Charter if Egypt staged future raids and blockades against Israel.

In 1967, Egypt’s closing of the Straits of Tiran to Israeli ships before June 5, was an unlawful act of aggression. The Israeli response was a lawful act of self-defense under Article 51 and UN General Assembly Resolution 3314.

Israel’s enemies and critics ignore or conveniently forget the facts, as Arabs and their sympathizers continue to blame Israel for ‘starting’ the 1967 war.

Were the acts by Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser in 1967 against Israel aggressive enough to warrant Israel’s exercise of her right to self-defense?

The answer can be found on the official website of the Jordanian Government14 under the heading “The Disaster of 1967.” It describes the events of the days prior to June 5, 1967 and clearly indicates that Jordan, at least, expected Egypt to launch the offensive war against Israel. Israel did not enter the West Bank until it was first attacked by Jordan:

“On May 16, Nasser shocked the world by asking the United Nations to withdraw its forces from Sinai. To the surprise of many, his request was honored two days later. Moreover, the Egyptian president closed the Straits of Tiran on May 22. Sensing that war was now likely, [And] … in response to the Israeli attack [on the Egyptian Air Force], Jordanian forces launched an offensive into Israel, but were soon driven back as the Israeli forces counterattacked into the West Bank and Arab East Jerusalem.”

In fact, Jordan was an illegal occupier of the West Bank from 1948 to 1967, and the undisputable aggressor in the Six-Day War of 1967. Thus, Israel acted lawfully by exercising its right of self-defense when it redeemed and legally occupied Judea and Samaria, known also as the West Bank.

Israel had clarified to Jordan through UN diplomatic channels that it should stay out of the war. It stated simply: “We shall not attack any country unless it opens war on us.” King Hussein of Jordan sent a reply via the UN envoy that “since Israel had attacked Egypt, [Israel] would receive his reply by air” – a message that came in the form of Jordanian air raids on civilian and military targets, shelling Jerusalem with mortars and long-range artillery on Ben-Gurion Airport, then extending the front to shelling Israel’s “narrow hips” under the mistaken belief that the Arabs were winning. Had Jordan heeded Israel’s message of peace instead of Egypt’s lies that the Arabs were winning the war, the Hashemite Kingdom could have remained neutral in the conflict, and Eastern Jerusalem and the West Bank would have remained in Jordan’s possession. Jordan was far from a ‘minor player’ in the Arabs’ war of aggression as their narrative implies. I srael lost 183 soldiers in battle with Jordanian forces.

Judge Sir Elihu Lauterpacht wrote in 1968, just one year after the 1967 Six-Day War:

“On 5th June, 1967, Jordan deliberately overthrew the Armistice Agreement by attacking the Israeli-held part of Jerusalem. There was no question of this Jordanian action being a reaction to any Israeli attack. It took place not with-standing explicit Israeli assurances, conveyed to King Hussein through the U.N. Commander, that if Jordan did not attack Israel, Israel would not attack Jordan. Although the charge of aggression is freely made against Israel in relation to the Six-Days War the fact remains that the two attempts made in the General Assembly in June-July 1967 to secure the condemnation of Israel as an aggressor failed. A clear and striking majority of the members of the U.N. voted against the proposition that Israel was an aggressor.”

Judge Schwebel’s writings lead to the conclusion that under international law, Israel is permitted to stay in the West Bank as long as it is necessary to her self-defense.

Defensive Wars and Wars of Aggression

International law makes a clear distinction between defensive wars and wars of aggression. All of Israel’s wars with its Arab neighbors were in self-defense.

Judge Schwebel, wrote in What Weight to Conquest:

“(a) a state [Israel] acting in lawful exercise of its right of self-defense may seize and occupy foreign territory as long as such seizure and occupation are necessary to its self-defense;

“(b) as condition of its withdrawal from such territory, that State may require the institution of security measures reasonably designed to ensure that that territory shall not again be used to mount a threat or use of force against it of such a nature as to justify exercise of self-defense;

“(c) Where the prior holder of territory [Jordan] had seized that territory unlawfully, the state which subsequently takes that territory in the lawful exercise of self-defense has, against that prior holder, better title. “… as between Israel, acting defensively in 1948 and 1967, on the one hand, and her Arab neighbors, acting aggressively, in 1948 and 1967, on the other, Israel has the better title in the territory of what was Palestine, including the whole of Jerusalem, than do Jordan and Egypt.”

UN “Inadmissibility of the Acquisition of Territory by Force”

Most UN General Assembly Resolutions regarding Israel read at the start: “Aware of the established principle of international law on the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by force.”

Judge Schwebel, explains that the principle of “acquisition of territory by war is inadmissible” must be read together with other principles: “… namely, that no legal right shall spring from a wrong, and the Charter principle that the Members of the United Nations shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State.”

Simply stated: Arab illegal aggression against the territorial integrity and political independence of Israel can not and should not be rewarded. Judge Sir Elihu Lauterpacht, Judge ad hoc of the International Court of Justice, argued in 1968 that:

“… Territorial change cannot properly take place as a result of the ‘unlawful’ use of force. But to omit the word ‘unlawful’ is to change the substantive content of the rule and to turn an important safeguard of legal principle into an aggressor’s charter. For if force can never be used to effect lawful territory change, then, if territory has once changed hands as a result of the unlawful use of force, the illegitimacy of the position thus established is sterilized by the prohibition upon the use of force to restore the lawful sovereign. This cannot be regarded as reasonable or correct.”

Professor Julius Stone, a leading authority on the Law of Nations, stated:

“Territorial Rights Under International Law. … By their [Arab countries] armed attacks against the State of Israel in 1948, 1967, and 1973, and by various acts of belligerency throughout this period, these Arab states flouted their basic obligations as United Nations members to refrain from threat or use of force against Israel’s territorial integrity and political independence. These acts were in flagrant violation inter alia [among other things] of Article 2(4) and paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of the same article.”

// //

My Rage Against the Machine

I’m generally a very even tempered guy. My norm is to think things through and after careful consideration choose an appropriate course of action.  But the events recently have my dander in an uproar. The Bengazi affair has been an open wound for America, and caused not only American deaths in Libya, but affected the Presidential election as well when the moderator openly lied about the facts in favor of Dictator-in-Chief Obama. But now recently more whistleblowers are revealing that the Stevens’ mission in Benghazi…. was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA..[who]  had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming “insurgents” with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.  Read more here.

If I have this correct, according to the Obama regime, America is not at war with that backward, hate filled religion, known throughout the world as Islam, but with al-Kaida and other “extremists.” This mantra has been repeated time and against during his presidency. So it naturally follows that he would of course arm our hated enemy with stinger missles so as to further endanger innocent lives, all for the sake of overthrowing that lunatic Kaddafi so the Muslim nightmare of another Caliphate might arise and to further control another oil producing nation.

Do not forget Obama’s speech to the United Nations General Assembly in 2012 where he stated  “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.” I say Islam needs to grow thicker skin and quick being so sissyfied.

Now while America has been distracted with Bengazi hearings, IRS Gestapo tactics and the AP email fiasco, our government was busy putting some final touches on creating the newest version of the Nazi Amerika of the New World Order.  At a recent Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC) hearing, those in attendance were shocked to realize that the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force Against Terrorists (AUMF) would be extended for a few more decades out of ‘necessity.’ One elected official commented about how frightening the implications of the hearing were. Senator Angus King stated that the governments current interpretation of the AUMF nullifies the Constitution because it ignores Congress’ role to declare war.

AUMF was a collaboration of the Congress and the US Armed Forces to battle against the attacks on 9/11. According to the text, the AUMF empowers the president when “acts render it both necessary and appropriate that the United States exercise its rights to self-defense and to protect United States citizens both at home and abroad”, threatens national security and foreign policy with “grave acts of violence” then “the President has authority under the Constitution to take action to deter and prevent acts” with the use of military force.  Most of us now realize that 911 was a false flag designed to put in place draconian legislation to further erode our rights.

President Obama could authorize “lethal force” be used on Americans here in the US, meaning that Obama can utilize the AUMF to assign military to patrol American streets as a matter of routine. See more at Before its News

There is fear, and deservedly so, that the Hitleresque Obama regime would also employ drones against Americans on American soil. If we remember the traitorous Lindsay Graham stated recently that the battlefield is where ever the enemy was, hinting that American soil was also considered a battlefield. Legislation has already been put into place that has determined that very thing. Obama has clearly telegraphed his intentions. He hates those who hold onto their God and their guns, as long as their not his precious Muslim horde. He has no problem circumventing the Constitution and thinks nothing of our lives or the devastation that he has already cause and plans to cause in the future.

We have warned our readers that this was coming. That Obama and his stormtroopers want to arrest anyone who poses a threat to the NWO and his power-grab for dictator for life.

I am ashamed of our country, it’s government not the people, though a large majority of American are simply to ignorant or apathetic and have contributed greatly to the rise of this charlatan bastard posing as a US President. He is a curse, an literal abomination of the highest order. The very fact that America elected such a vile person shows that America has lost her way and no longer can recognize right from wrong, evil from good or a good president from the Devils Imp.

It is too far gone to reclaim America. The only real course of action is to oppose them at every move, at every corner, in every way. Sadly America, if it is to be reborn – if it can even be reborn – must burn. The framer of the original American society believed that freedom must be rekindled again and again and only the blood of freedom loving Americans can cleanse her – can rekindle the fires of freedom.

Our enemies, here and abroad and those of our government who think God fearing men and women, who love life and liberty, are the real criminals, the real terrorists. The reality is that our country has been usurped by a group of fanatical despots posing as elected officials. And I say this with certain trepidation but with heartfelt conviction – our enemies must not only hear our condemnation of their crimes, but must also feel our righteous indignation. To be dragged into citizen courts and tried for high treason and the sentence executed with extreme prejudice. For they are the scum of mankind, vile beings who have no right to exist among peace loving and God fearing, men women and children of earth. It is they who must submit to us. This will come in time, but only after righteous men and women have made the ultimate sacrifice.

Some of you may take issue with my candor, but I care not. Traitors, murderers, false prophets, despots cruel tyrants all must feel the executioners hand. Our world has been tainted, rendered unclean, by these sociopaths who run our planet, who only care for power, greed and death. They worship death, they love death, and I for one believe we should bless them with it.  The Dark Time is near upon us . Guard your lives and your family, even at the expense of the wicked. Be a good steward of Gods bounty – love those who love God – hate those who hate Him. Carry a bible in one hand and gun in the other. Stand against tyranny and give them no quarter.

// //

The Army of the Black Pope

jesuit logoSince the election of the very first Jesuit Pope – Francis Xavier, (Petrus Romanus) I have spent a considerable amount of time studying and researching the Jesuit Order, their origins and history.  The say the least I am convinced that The Jesuit Pope plays a key role in the last days and his abominable order, the Society of Jesus.  For a number of years as I researched and uncovered the machinations of the New World Order and their “thousands of conspiracies operating in tandem”, I knew that there was a missing piece of the puzzle – a veritable ‘missing link’ which would complete the picture. I knew from my studies that the Catholic Orders were very much part of what refer to as the Illuminati Web.  But is was not till this year that I have now come to terms with the reality that the Jesuits are the primary architects of the New World Order and they themselves created the Bavarian Illuminati and the modern version which is simply called the Illuminati.

I am simply dumbfounded by the massive amount of documentation and evidence that exists proving the satanic agenda of the Jesuits and the Papacy and the fact that most of it has been suppressed or has not been given a voice. That all is going to change, at least for those who are seeking out the truth.

I also soon discovered that the Jesuits were the power behind Hitlers Nazi Germany and it’s final solution for me and my co-religionists (the Jewish nation). The plans of the Jesuit controlled Papacy regarding Israel and Jerusalem are bone-chilling.

Read the ground-breaking expose’ Vatican Assassins by Eric Jon Phelps who assembles a massive array of historical evidence Jesuit complicity in most of the European wars, assassination of heads of state including US presidents. There is ample amount of evidence that shows the real Society of Jesus to be a Luciferian Occult Organization with connections to The Black Nobility and the Committee of 300.

In fact the evidence shows that the Jesuits are not only part of the occult based web of secret societies and New World Order groups but is in fact the puppet-master behind them. Numerous statesmen and national leaders have warned of the power of the Jesuits and their drive for world domination.

Another important book to educate yourselves on the unparalleled power of the Papacy and the Jesuit Order is Bill Hughes The Secret Terrorists which documents the Jesuit machinations behind the establishment of America’ first three central banks, the assassinations and attempted assassinations  of not only Abe Lincoln but also Presidents, Andrew Jackson, William Harrison, James Garfield, William McKinley and JFK. He documents the Jesuit agenda to overthrow the US through the Freemasons and International Bankers which they control. Hughes quotes a letter from Abe Lincoln to his friend Charles Chiniquy in which the President believed that the Jesuits were plotting his assassination. Few people realize that on his way to his inauguration, Abe Lincoln was made aware of a Jesuit plot to murder him in Baltimore before he took office and took measures to prevent this.

As time goes on we will be posting much more information and links to illuminate the deeds, actions and agenda of the most despotic organization that ever existed. Check our page – The Black Army of the Pope for updates. Please come back!